Ballot Watcher - 2020 General Election

In analyzing New Jersey's voter dataset, I found New Jersey's election fraud could be more serious than Pennsylvania's, but it has been kept out of the public eye because it is not a swing state.  Since New Jersey sends all active voters mail-in ballots automatically, the accuracy of the voter list is extremely important. First, I would like to talk a little about the reason for reading the New Jersey database. While analyzing the Pennsylvania data set, I came across a suspicious set of voter information from voters who lived in Pennsylvania and used out-of-state phone numbers. With the help of a fraud investigator from Epochtimes, we were able to make random phone calls to verify the information.   A Mr. Thomas X, who lives in Adams County, told us that he had lived temporarily in a neighboring state, New Jersey, and then returned to his home state of Pennsylvania. This time when he went to vote, Pennsylvania would not let him vote, saying that he was registered as a voter

After waiting for over ten days, I finally got an email with the download URL for the Georgia Voter Database. The first problem I found when I opened the database was: Did 100% of Georgia's adult citizens register as voters? Registered Voters Slightly Outnumbered Georgia's Adult Citizens According to the 2019 U.S. Census Bureau website shown above, Georgia's population is 10,617,423. ( https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/GA/PST045219 ) According to the DataUSA.io website, U.S. citizens in Georgia make up approximately 94.4% of the population, or 10,022,847 people. （source：https://datausa.io/profile/geo/georgia/#demographics） Let's go back to the chart above, the percentage of the population under the age of 18 is 23.6%, which means that 76.4% of the population of the state of Georgia is over the age of 18.  So the number of adult citizens is approximately 7,657,455. There are 7,665,238 rows of registered voter records in the Georgia dataset. It is slightly more

NVRA Reference: The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 - Last Updated: 2021.01.03 State Researcher / Date / County / Dataset Highlight Links All Swing States Matt Braynard - 2020.11.26 [Voter Reg / Absentee] "Evidence of Vote Fraud Enough to Easily Flip States" P.O./UPS/FedEx Boxes disguised as Apt/Suite/Unit# Georgia: >1000; Pennsylvania >1400 so far Checked Mail Not Returned: Didn't Requested/Returned But Not Counted 18 min video ; PO Box List PedeInspector - 2020.11.10 [Dominion Machines] 500,000 votes SWITCHED from Trump to Biden news1 news2 report1 report2 Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai - 2020.11.30 [Dominion Machines] Vote Weight 1.3 vs 0.7; Ballot Images preset to be deleted 33min Video Edward Solomon - 2020.11.20-12.05 [Dominion Machines] Algorithm Reverse-Engineered: How Dominion Machines Shifted votes from Biden to Trump discussion1 discussion2 video1 Simulation video2 PA Precincts video3 Atlanta Precincts Economist John Lott P

My analysis of the Wisconsin election database, based on a dataset downloaded on November 10 cutoff, revealed a number of problems with the state's database, including missing information, mismanagement, no effective mechanism to prevent duplicate ballots, and the ability to create voter counts at any time. Absurd Download Fees - A Patriotic Citizen Bought the Dataset In the beginning of this article, I would briefly tell the story of this dataset. When a citizen in Wisconsin heard about fraud in his local election, he was concerned that his ballot had been tampered with and wanted to check the government database. The election dataset is publicly available ( https://badgervoters.wi.gov/ ) and can be purchased by anyone, but he was shocked when he opened the website and saw that the page stated that it cost $12,500 to download the voter list data, $12,500 to download the mail-in ballot data, and $25,000 to buy the entire data set. He was furious that a database that could be downlo

Every state in the United States has a more or less transparent approach to elections and share much of the raw data with the public. Pennsylvania is no exception. In a state with many complaints of campaign fraud, voter data is updated weekly and can be downloaded for $20 per download. I downloaded four dataset snapshots of Pennsylvania's voter rolls updated on November 2, 9, 16, and 23 respectively to compare and analyze to see if the fraud complaints were reflected in the database. The comparison revealed that, as of November 20, the number of voters in the Pennsylvania database who had participated in this poll differed by more than one million from the total number of ballots published in the media. Voter Database Information Should be Consistent with The Total Number of Voters Let's start with some basic numbers: the database table contains over nine million rows of registered voters, and each voter profile contains 153 columns, including voter ID, name, address, party, s

On November 9, I published an article in the Chinese Epoch Times titled "Pennsylvania Ballot Data Suspicions: 220-Year-Olds Vote by Mail" (in Chinese)   which pointed out that there was evidence of fraud in Pennsylvania's "2020_General_Election_Mail_Ballot_Requests_Department_of_State" dataset. The dataset was updated on November 6, among which 23,305 ballots were returned earlier than sent dates. The following day, an English-language Epoch reporter questioned the Pennsylvania government and ran a story based on the article, " Tens of Thousands of Pennsylvania Ballots Returned Earlier Than Sent Date: Researcher ". After the article was published, I found that between November 10 and 15, 23,305 ballots were still available on the official Pennsylvania State Government website for "ballots received by the government earlier than the date they were mailed out. When the dataset was updated on November 16, the 23,305 questionable ballots mentioned in