Georgia's Voter Database: 100% Adult Citizens Registered As Voters?

After waiting for over ten days, I finally got an email with the download URL for the Georgia Voter Database. The first problem I found when I opened the database was: Did 100% of Georgia's adult citizens register as voters?

Registered Voters Slightly Outnumbered Georgia's Adult Citizens



According to the 2019 U.S. Census Bureau website shown above, Georgia's population is 10,617,423. ( https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/GA/PST045219 )

According to the DataUSA.io website, U.S. citizens in Georgia make up approximately 94.4% of the population, or 10,022,847 people.

（source：https://datausa.io/profile/geo/georgia/#demographics）

Let's go back to the chart above, the percentage of the population under the age of 18 is 23.6%, which means that 76.4% of the population of the state of Georgia is over the age of 18.  So the number of adult citizens is approximately 7,657,455.

There are 7,665,238 rows of registered voter records in the Georgia dataset. It is slightly more than the number of adult citizens in the state of Georgia.

It is important to understand that the Georgia database is not like Wisconsin where a new voter ID is inserted into the database whenever you change your name or address (which has an even worse identity problem).  Georgia keeps one voter ID per person and changing name or address should still retain the voter ID.  With 100% of adults being voters, this is a ridiculously high percentage! At the very least, this means that the state automatically registers as a voter if they become adults.  Even though the state does require people to register for voters themselves ( https://georgia.gov/register-to-vote ).  So the database actually counts 100% of all adults as voters! There is no other way to explain how 7,665,238 lines of voter records were created legally.

Of these, 7,276,062 are active voters, representing 95% of the adult citizen population. It is still rare for a state to have 95% of its adult population as active voters.

When I listed the population, registered voters (from database), and active voters (from database) by county, we can see how ridiculous the numbers of active voters are (the most ridiculous are listed first; please note that the "Adult Citizens" in the table are calculated as "population X 94.4% X 76.4%") in each county).

Over 100% active voters per adult citizens in so many counties?   Such a database is not trustworthy and cannot be used.

Mail-in ballots without authentication and signature verification are full of vulnerabilities.

Let's see what harm this database brings.  At the December 3 hearing in Georgia, a university senior named Grace spoke about her walk-in experience to vote. She was told by the staff at polling center that the records showed she had successfully voted by mail. She denied that she had voted.  She signed an affidavit, asked to vote on the spot, and successfully cast her ballot.

Who stole her personal information and successfully cast a ballot by mail?  She asked the state government to investigate. More than a month went by with no results and so she came to the hearing to report the incident.

Grace reported at the Dec. 3 hearing in Georgia that someone cast a mail-in ballot in her name.

Assuming her address is correct in the database, who could obtain her mail-in ballot then?  What this really tells us is that this database contains a lot of information about voters, and if they don't vote in a particular election, someone who have access to the election office can vote for them at any time.

Another problem is that 99.99% of the mail-in ballots do not require identification.

In Georgia, you are required to show identification to go to the polls to vote. However, it's almost never required for mail-in ballots. ( https://www.voteriders.org/states/georgia/ )

How do I know?  The absentee ballot dataset downloaded on November 16th contains a column called "ID Required", 99.991% of which were marked with a "NO" value.  Only 0.009% of the records have a "YES" value. The breakdown is shown below. (N.B.  Absentee ballot dataset is a different one than the registered voter database mentioned earlier)



Mail-in ballots actually require signatures supposedly, but it was reported that many of the mail-in ballots this time did not get validated.  If you don't even need to verify signatures, the election in Georgia becomes a game of self-interest: Whoever controls the election centers, gets the personal information, and obtains the unrequested ballots wins!

The above-mentioned Grace lives in Fulton County, which I have also spend sometime to investigate. There were eighty-four thousand (849,744) registered voters. But the absentee records showed that 210,781 of them successfully cast their ballots by mail.

How many people actually voted by absentee? And how many of them acted like Grace, who fought for the right to vote herself?

Duplicate Voting Is Possible, Shown With 23 Cases

There is another problem found in the dataset of mail-in ballots (all of the graphs below are from the Georgia Absentee Dataset).

The so-called absentee dataset I downloaded on November 16th contains 4,505,788 rows of records. A rough examination reveals that they are mainly divided into mail-in and early voting ballots (plus less than 1% of military electronic ballots).  These ballot records correspond to 4,195,388 voters only, suggesting that some voters received more than one mail-in ballot for various reasons.

For example, the following three ballots were sent to voter with a "0000010101" Voter ID.  The first was rejected, with a "Status Reason" saying the mail was Damaged.  The second was SPOILED (which could mean defacement, errors, omissions, and etc).  The third one was finally accepted (Ballot Status changed to A).

The ballot IDs indicate that there were three absentee ballots sent, and the third one was finally accepted. The voter's insistence on using a postal ballot is a bit of an obsession, but this is considered normal procedure.

Some are unusual, however.  I found 23 cases where their ballots were repeatedly swept in, and some were even mailed out repeatedly and accepted. The broken lines in the following tables are used to separate the different voters. A few examples are chosen to help the reader understand the meaning.

The voter with ID 01743398 in rows 2 and 3: His ballots were issued and sent out on September 18th and October 9th respectively.  They got the same ballot number (00385), and both were scanned in and accepted by the system.

The voter with ID 02063623 in rows 5-7: He received the ballot sent on September 18th, but abandoned voting by mail and came to vote at polling station #044432 on October 15th.  Two ballot numbers (02681 and 02687) were scanned in.

Voter #02066680 in rows 9-11, also came to vote at polling place 060694 on October 23rd, and swept two ballots (06677 and 07146).

Voter #02503470 in rows 23 and 24 sent back ballot #01018 and was scanned in on October 26th.  But before it arrived he had come to the polling station #060804 on October 16 and scanned in a ballot 03483.

For voter #04687367 in rows 37-39, the polling center sent out three ballots.  One of which was declared undeliverable.  But the other two were scanned in on October 28, with ballot numbers 00235 and 00628 respectively.



Voters #05977767 in rows 47 and 48, came to polling station 060702 on Oct. 13th and Oct. 18th respectively, and scanned in ballots number 03155 and 02835, respectively.

 Voter #12782544, on rows 78 and 79, mailed back a ballot 00341 which was received on November 1st.  But he had already gone in person to polling place number 075034 on October 29 and was scanned into ballot number 13923.

These duplicate ballots casted by the same voters respectively, or some by their clones?

Judging from these 23 cases, Georgia lacks an effective mechanism to prevent duplicate scanning of a ballot, duplicate photocopied ballots, or even duplicate mailings of ballots in some case. This would be the biggest problem with their election database.

A common problem with the database Swing states working together to manipulate their state's election?

The source of this absentee ballot dataset is also in question.

I downloaded the Georgia absentee mail-in ballot dataset from this website:

    https://elections.sos.ga.gov/Elections/voterabsenteefile.do

In fact, I downloaded different versions of it on November 9, November 13, and November 16 respectively.  All of which were free. But on November 21, when I went to download the data set again, I found the content of the dataset become meaningless rows of numbers. I tried again a few times, and it was still the same on December 2.

The date November 21st is highly coincident with the date that Pennsylvania stopped letting people download absentee ballots.

Given that many of the election shenanigans this time around occurred simultaneously in multiple states on the same day, I believe that the problems with the swing state databases are common, the administrative patterns are common, and the administrators communicate closely with each other. Perhaps their goal is also common - to manipulate their state's general election?

135 Dead People Voting?

Finally, we come back to the old question, are there any voters who are too old?

Because Georgia's voter database doesn't reveal birthdays but only the year of birth, we can use that to compare to the oldest American birth year, 1904, and Georgia has 135 records of people born between 1800 and 1902 who voted this time, ranging from 220 to 118 years old.

 

We heard that Georgia may test the signatures now.  With such a database out there, even if all ballots got checked twice, the election would still be unfair.

Georgia has also a senate election coming up in January.  The election will not be fair until the database is cleaned up and the mail-in ballots are abandoned.  Walk in and vote so that Georgia truly has one citizen one vote system.

Ting Mei 2020.12.05

Translated from Chinese Epochtimes:  https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/20/12/5/n12598155.htm

 ------------------------------

Update: 2020.12.06

Georgia Voter Fraud Testimonies.

 Grace from Fulton (mentioned in the above article):

Gwinnet Resident:

Deceased Daughter Voting:

 

Dominion Poll Tech Person: